February 14th, 2008
Three friends of mine have started a podcast on writing. Brandon Sanderson, Howard Tayler, and Dan Wells discuss brainstorming in their first episode of Writing Excuses. New episodes will be published every Monday.
Also, it's 15 minutes long, "because you're in a hurry, and we're not that smart." :)
I'll just give you a little insight into a day in the life of an editor. As I've already mentioned, I'm pretty swamped right now. I've got more than my normal load of books coming in, so I'm doing my best to make sure that everything stays on the tight schedule we've got them on, and that each author has enough time to look over changes and have time for revisions, get manuscripts to the copyeditor on time, turned over to typesetting, etc.
But sometimes in that frenetic pace you need to take a break. I'm also drowning in paper here at Chez Stacy, and it was time to answer especially the most languishing of languishness in my submissions pile.
But what to do when my brain is slightly fried, and I don't feel like you can concentrate on a whole novel? After all, the reason I needed a little break in the first place was because I was working on a novel under contract already. I need something a little shorter, a break in the pace.
So I went to the partials, rather than the requested manuscripts. Sample chapters are always going to be answered a little faster, because they can be taken in small chunks, and sending out five or six responses in a couple hours feels like I've accomplished something. The requested manuscripts need more time and contemplation, obviously--for one, they're larger, and for another, they're usually, percentage-wise, better written.
Another thing about slowness of response on submissions: Sometimes, it's the just-on-the-cusp work that languishes the longest. Not always, but usually. Sometimes the best work will languish because the editor wants to find a place for it and doesn't want to say yes until she gets approval, but can't bear to say no because then she'd have to let it go. But usually, for me, at least, it's the work that's pretty good, but I'm on the fence about, that stays around the longest because those are the submissions I want to give encouragement to. It's those writers that I know that perhaps this submission isn't quite there, but with this and that tweaked perhaps their next work might make it. That kind of response takes thought and time, which of course is always in short supply when you've got several contracted books in various stages of the editorial process demanding your attention, with several other books in various stages of writing whose authors need questions answered or whose marketing information is coming due or for which the map orders or cover art or cover copy needs to be concepted/written.
( A little bit about editing series )
So that gives you a little better idea of one short day in the life of an editor, and the thinking that goes into getting through submissions one one short day. On another day, the thinking might be, "Wow, I have a whole leisurely day ahead of me to read an entire requested manuscript!" but generally requested manuscripts are read on our own time, late at night or on weekends. So if your manuscript has been requested, patience is indeed a virtue. It probably means that editor wants to make sure to give it the time it deserves.
But sometimes in that frenetic pace you need to take a break. I'm also drowning in paper here at Chez Stacy, and it was time to answer especially the most languishing of languishness in my submissions pile.
But what to do when my brain is slightly fried, and I don't feel like you can concentrate on a whole novel? After all, the reason I needed a little break in the first place was because I was working on a novel under contract already. I need something a little shorter, a break in the pace.
So I went to the partials, rather than the requested manuscripts. Sample chapters are always going to be answered a little faster, because they can be taken in small chunks, and sending out five or six responses in a couple hours feels like I've accomplished something. The requested manuscripts need more time and contemplation, obviously--for one, they're larger, and for another, they're usually, percentage-wise, better written.
Another thing about slowness of response on submissions: Sometimes, it's the just-on-the-cusp work that languishes the longest. Not always, but usually. Sometimes the best work will languish because the editor wants to find a place for it and doesn't want to say yes until she gets approval, but can't bear to say no because then she'd have to let it go. But usually, for me, at least, it's the work that's pretty good, but I'm on the fence about, that stays around the longest because those are the submissions I want to give encouragement to. It's those writers that I know that perhaps this submission isn't quite there, but with this and that tweaked perhaps their next work might make it. That kind of response takes thought and time, which of course is always in short supply when you've got several contracted books in various stages of the editorial process demanding your attention, with several other books in various stages of writing whose authors need questions answered or whose marketing information is coming due or for which the map orders or cover art or cover copy needs to be concepted/written.
( A little bit about editing series )
So that gives you a little better idea of one short day in the life of an editor, and the thinking that goes into getting through submissions one one short day. On another day, the thinking might be, "Wow, I have a whole leisurely day ahead of me to read an entire requested manuscript!" but generally requested manuscripts are read on our own time, late at night or on weekends. So if your manuscript has been requested, patience is indeed a virtue. It probably means that editor wants to make sure to give it the time it deserves.
As I mentioned, I have been invited to speak at the BYU Writing for Young Readers conference. I've been thinking about what I'd like to talk about, because they need the title of my talk soon, and I've been inspired by my friend
raisinfish to tackle an age-old question: will writing to the market give you a better chance to get published?
I think this is a complicated question in children's literature, because there are competing interests that must be considered.
But it's an interesting topic to me, certainly.
What do you all think? If you were attending a conference to hear me talk, would this be of interest to you? Any suggestions on a snappier way of phrasing the title? (That particular phrasing was right off the top of my head--I know, it's SO clever!)
I think this is a complicated question in children's literature, because there are competing interests that must be considered.
But it's an interesting topic to me, certainly.
What do you all think? If you were attending a conference to hear me talk, would this be of interest to you? Any suggestions on a snappier way of phrasing the title? (That particular phrasing was right off the top of my head--I know, it's SO clever!)
